Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938519›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2023

Prognostic value of fragmented QRS in acute pulmonary embolism: a cross-sectional-analytic study of the Iranian population.

Mahsa Asadi Anar, Akram Ansari, Gisou Erabi, Mohammad Rahmanian, Mahdiyeh Movahedi, Fatemeh Chichagi, Niloofar Deravi, Farid Taghavi, Babak Kazemi, Elnaz Javanshir and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahsa Asadi AnarStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.
Akram AnsariMedical Student, Shantou University Medical College Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Gisou ErabiStudent Research Committee, Urmia University of Medical Sciences Urmia, Iran.
Mohammad RahmanianStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.
Mahdiyeh MovahediShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh ChichagiStudents' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.
Niloofar DeraviStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.
Farid TaghaviCardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz, Iran.
Babak KazemiCardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz, Iran.
Elnaz JavanshirCardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz, Iran.
Erfan AmoueiResearch Center for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Institute of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Iran University of Medical Science Tehran, Iran.
Samad GhaffariCardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute Pulmonary embolism (APE) is considered one of the deadliest cardiovascular diseases. Electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities in pulmonary embolism (PE) are increasingly reported. A growing number of studies have recommended that ECG plays a crucial role in the prognostic assessment of PE patients. However, there is scarce data on the prognostic importance of fragmented QRS (fQRS) on outcomes in patients with APE. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of fQRS in APE patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a cross-sectional-analytic study. This study included 280 patients diagnosed with APE admitted to Shahid Madani hospital, Tabriz, Iran. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was used to diagnose APE. A checklist was prepared for all patients, demographic, clinical characteristics, and Major Adverse Cardiopulmonary events (MACPE), including in-hospital mortality, need for thrombolysis, mechanical ventilation, and surgical embolectomy, were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who manifested fQRS on their ECG and patients who did not; Then, demographic, clinical characteristics, and MACPE were compared in the two groups, as mentioned earlier. Furthermore, all statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software.

results48 patients (17.14%) had fQRS(+) on their ECG, and 232 patients (82.86%) did not have it on their ECG. In data analysis, 22 patients (8.7%) had in-hospital mortality, 35 patients (13.9%) needed thrombolysis, nine patients (3.9%) required mechanical ventilation, and 13 patients (5.1%) needed surgical embolectomy. fQRS was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (P = 0.225), need for thrombolysis (P = 0.684), mechanical ventilation (P = 1.000), and surgical embolectomy (P = 1.000). Demographic and clinical characteristics were also similar in both groups.

conclusionsThis study does not support the idea that fQRS on ECG is a valuable predictor of in-hospital mortality, the need for thrombolysis, mechanical ventilation, and surgical embolectomy.

Indexed as

acute pulmonary embolism (APE)Fragmented QRS (fQRS)prognostic value

Identifiers

PMID36938519
PMCPMC10017924
OpenAlexW4327900618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.