Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938497›Full record

ArticleNature cardiovascular research2022

A single-cell comparison of adult and fetal human epicardium defines the age-associated changes in epicardial activity.

Vincent R Knight-Schrijver, Hongorzul Davaapil, Semih Bayraktar, Alexander D B Ross, Kazumasa Kanemaru, James Cranley, Monika Dabrowska, Minal Patel, Krzysztof Polanski, Xiaoling He and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cardiovascular research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Embryonic Mouse Cardiac Fibroblast Isolation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Immune-mediated cardiac development and regeneration.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vincent R Knight-SchrijverWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7916-3827
Hongorzul DavaapilWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Semih BayraktarWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alexander D B RossWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Kazumasa KanemaruWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
James CranleyWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Monika DabrowskaWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Minal PatelWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Krzysztof PolanskiWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Xiaoling HeJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Ludovic VallierWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sarah TeichmannWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Laure GambardellaWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5771-1565
Sanjay SinhaWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5900-1209
Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/13/29/30024British Heart Foundation FS/13/65/30441British Heart Foundation FS/18/46/33663British Heart Foundation PG/17/24/32886British Heart Foundation RG/17/5/32936British Heart Foundation RM/17/2/33380Medical Research Council G0701448Wellcome Trust 203151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Re-activating quiescent adult epicardium represents a potential therapeutic approach for human cardiac regeneration. However, the exact molecular differences between inactive adult and active fetal epicardium are not known. In this study, we combined fetal and adult human hearts using single-cell and single-nuclei RNA sequencing and compared epicardial cells from both stages. We found that a migratory fibroblast-like epicardial population only in the fetal heart and fetal epicardium expressed angiogenic gene programs, whereas the adult epicardium was solely mesothelial and immune responsive. Furthermore, we predicted that adult hearts may still receive fetal epicardial paracrine communication, including WNT signaling with endocardium, reinforcing the validity of regenerative strategies that administer or reactivate epicardial cells in situ. Finally, we explained graft efficacy of our human embryonic stem-cell-derived epicardium model by noting its similarity to human fetal epicardium. Overall, our study defines epicardial programs of regenerative angiogenesis absent in adult hearts, contextualizes animal studies and defines epicardial states required for effective human heart regeneration.

Identifiers

PMID36938497
PMCPMC7614330
OpenAlexW4312192875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.