ArticleHeliyon2023
Performance investigations for sustainability assessment of Hastelloy C-276 under different machining environments.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hastelloy is categorized as difficult to cut superalloy widely used in aerospace, nuclear reactor components and chemical industry because of its magnificent strength and higher heat efficiency. Since, the machining of this material is quite difficult and hence suitable cooling systems are required to achieve sustainable manufacturing goals. The present investigation has been focused on the machining performance and sustainability assessment of turning Hastelloy C-276 in dry, flood and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) environments. Taguchi L-9 array has been utilized to conduct and record the experimental output along with TOPSIS approach to evaluate the sustainability. The output responses viz. cutting forces, surface roughness, cutting temperature, energy consumption and carbon emission have been recorded at various levels of input variables. The experimental results revealed that MQL has minimized the cutting forces, surface roughness and temperature by margin of 20-38%. Likewise, energy expenditure and carbon emission was declined by 9-27% respectively compared to other conditions. Sustainability analysis explored best performance index during equal weightage criteria at 125 m/min, 0.246 and 0.8 mm doc under MQL. However, implementing assigned weightage system evaluated best condition for dry machining as 88 m/min and 0.246 mm/rev having same doc. SEM analysis of insert reported mainly abrasion and adhesion type of tool wear at all parametric range and machining conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.