Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938432›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Identifying positive and negative use of non-technical skills by anesthesiologists in the clinical operating room: An exploratory descriptive study.

Cole Etherington, Joseph K Burns, Nibras Ghanmi, Agnes Crnic, Fadi Mansour, Christopher L Pysyk, Edward Crosby, Sylvain Boet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cole EtheringtonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Joseph K BurnsClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Nibras GhanmiFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Agnes CrnicDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Fadi MansourFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Christopher L PysykDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Edward CrosbyDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sylvain BoetClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Teamwork is a critical competency in high-risk settings like the operating room (OR). While conventional approaches focus on describing and learning from negative performance, there may be value in learning from high-performing behaviour, particularly in specialties where serious safety events are relatively rare. This study aimed to explore both the positive and negative use of non-technical skills by anesthesia practitioners in the OR and situate them within the clinical OR context. Methods: This study employed a prospective observational design. Following research ethics approval, a sample of surgical cases in a tertiary hospital were recorded using the OR Black Box®. Data related to surgical phase timing, non-technical skills, team factors, and environmental factors were identified by analysts according to a modified Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model. We performed descriptive statistics and qualitative description of these observations. Results: We observed 25 surgical cases capturing 242 instances of positive non-technical skills among anesthesiologists in the operating room and 9 instances of negative demonstrations. Situational awareness was most frequently (n = 160) observed, followed by communication and teamwork skills (n = 82), and were most often demonstrated in the context of potential environmental distractions (e.g., doors opening, unnecessary interruptions). The least common category of positive non-technical skills observed was leadership (n = 3). Conclusions: Our findings show anesthesiologists are doing a lot "right" and there may be many opportunities for learning from positive practice in the clinical setting. These findings can inform future work to better understand and standardize best practices for non-technical performance in anesthesia.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyOperating roomsPatient safetyPsychologicalResilience

Identifiers

PMID36938432
PMCPMC10018462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.