Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938429›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Turn-of-the-candle effect in bitcoin returns.

Savva Shanaev, Mikhail Vasenin, Roman Stepanov

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Savva ShanaevUniversity of Northumbria at Newcastle, United Kingdom, NE8 1ST, UK.
Mikhail VaseninUniversity of Northumbria at Newcastle, United Kingdom, NE8 1ST, UK.
Roman StepanovUniversity of Northumbria at Newcastle, United Kingdom, NE8 1ST, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study discovers a statistically and economically significant intraday anomaly on Bitcoin markets. Positive returns of 0.58 bps per minute are disproportionately concentrated at the turn of 15-min candles (in minutes 0, 15, 30, and 45 of each trading hour). Average returns in other trading minutes are negative. The effect is consistent across Bitcoin exchanges, in quantile regression models, and TGARCH-M estimations with heavy tails, and persist in out-of-sample tests. A high-frequency strategy that exploits this "turn-of-the-candle" effect can be net-outperforming with initial investment as low as $5,000. The anomaly is detected in the data starting from mid-to-late 2020, is potentially associated with algorithmic trading relying on the arrival of 15-min candle information, and its discovery contributes significantly to the understanding of cryptocurrency adaptive market efficiency.

Indexed as

BitcoinCryptocurrencyHigh frequencyMarket anomalyMarket efficiency

Identifiers

PMID36938429
PMCPMC10015199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read6
measurements read73
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.