ArticleArchives of clinical and biomedical research2023
Rapid Real-time Squiggle Classification for Read until using RawMap.
Article in Archives of clinical and biomedical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rawsamble: overlapping raw nanopore signals using a hash-based seeding mechanism.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Campolina: a deep neural framework for accurate segmentation of nanopore signals.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Basecalling-free resistance gene identification using a hybrid transformer in raw nanopore signals.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- MysteryMaster: scraping the bottom of the barrel of barcoded Oxford nanopore reads.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- RawHash2: mapping raw nanopore signals using hash-based seeding and adaptive quantization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Sigmoni: classification of nanopore signal with a compressed pangenome index.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- NanoDeep: a deep learning framework for nanopore adaptive sampling on microbial sequencing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Sigmoni: classification of nanopore signal with a compressed pangenome index.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- RawHash: enabling fast and accurate real-time analysis of raw nanopore signals for large genomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ReadUntil enables Oxford Nanopore Technology's (ONT) sequencers to selectively sequence reads of target species in real-time. This enables efficient microbial enrichment for applications such as microbial abundance estimation and is particularly beneficial for metagenomic samples with a very high fraction of non-target reads (> 99% can be human reads). However, read-until requires a fast and accurate software filter that analyzes a short prefix of a read and determines if it belongs to a microbe of interest (target) or not. The baseline Read Until pipeline uses a deep neural network-based basecaller called Guppy and is slow and inaccurate for this task (~60% of bases sequenced are unclassified). We present RawMap, an efficient CPU-only microbial species-agnostic Read Until classifier for filtering non-target human reads in the squiggle space. RawMap uses a Support Vector Machine (SVM), which is trained to distinguish human from microbe using non-linear and non-stationary characteristics of ONT's squiggle output (continuous electrical signals). Compared to the baseline Read Until pipeline, RawMap is a 1327X faster classifier and significantly improves the sequencing time and cost, and compute time savings. We show that RawMap augmented pipelines reduce sequencing time and cost by ~24% and computing cost by 22%. Additionally, since RawMap is agnostic to microbial species, it can also classify microbial species it is not trained on. We also discuss how RawMap may be used as an alternative to the RT-PCR test for viral load quantification of SARS-CoV-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.