Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938240›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration.

Rhett MacNeille, Johnson Lay, Jacob Razzouk, Shelly Bogue, Gideon Harianja, Evelyn Ouro-Rodrigues, Caleb Ting, Omar Ramos, Jennifer Veltman, Olumide Danisa

Open access · diamondFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rhett MacNeilleDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, USA.
Johnson LayDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, USA.
Jacob RazzoukDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA.
Shelly BogueDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, USA.
Gideon HarianjaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA.
Evelyn Ouro-RodriguesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA.
Caleb TingDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, USA.
Omar RamosDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, USA.
Jennifer VeltmanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, USA.
Olumide DanisaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, USA.
Arrowhead Regional Medical Center · USLoma Linda University Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USLoma Linda University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSpinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare process with significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Treatment includes an extended course of antibiotics with or without surgery depending on the clinical presentation. Both non-operative and surgically treated patients require close follow-up to ensure the resolution of the infection without recurrence and/or progression of neurologic deficits. No previous study has looked specifically at follow-up in the SEA population, but the review of the literature does show evidence of varying degrees of difficulty with follow-up for this patient population.

methodsThis retrospective review looked at follow-up for 147 patients with SEA at a single institution from 2012 to 2021. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences between groups of surgical versus non-surgical patients and those with adequate versus inadequate follow-up.

resultsSixty-two of 147 (42.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with their surgical team, and 112 of 147 (76.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with infectious disease (ID). The primary statistically significant difference between patients with adequate versus inadequate follow-up was found to be surgical status with those treated surgically more likely to have adequate follow-up than those treated non-operatively.

conclusionImproved follow-up in surgical patients should be considered as a factor when deciding on surgical versus non-operative treatment in the SEA patient population. Extra efforts coordinating follow-up care should be made for SEA patients.

Indexed as

infectious disease controlpatient follow-uppost-operative caresurgery spinetreatment of spinal epidural abscess

Identifiers

PMID36938240
PMCPMC10023045
OpenAlexW4321110843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read33
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.