Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938113›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2022

Comparative Assessment of Propofol and Ketamine on Hemodynamic Indices and Cerebral Oximetry of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization.

Maryam Sepehri Nour, Ali Dabbagh, Kamal Fani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maryam Sepehri NourAnesthesiology Department, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2105-7722
Ali DabbaghAnesthesiology Department, School of Medicine, Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4344-8131
Kamal FaniAnesthesiology Department, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7921-257X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Propofol and ketamine are widely used in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia and sedation with different cardiovascular and respiratory effects. In cardiac anesthesia (including pediatric cardiac catheterization), due to the high risk of neurologic complications, cerebral oximetry can effectively monitor cerebral blood oxygen saturation to prevent neurological and respiratory complications. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effect of propofol and ketamine on hemodynamic indices and cerebral oxygenation results in children undergoing cardiac catheterization. Methods: This clinical trial study was performed on 48 patients who were candidates for cardiac catheterization by easy and continuous sampling. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: ketamine and propofol. In the ketamine group, ketamine was injected at a dose of 1 - 2 mg/kg, and in the propofol group, propofol was injected at a dose of 0.5 - 1.5 mg/kg. In both groups, incremental doses were repeated as needed. The hemodynamic indices, including blood pressure, heart rate, and peripheral SpO Results: The results showed that all demographic characteristics of patients and also the mean duration of catheterization were homogeneous between the 2 groups. Hemodynamic indices (such as systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure) did not show a significant difference between the 2 groups; however, in the ketamine group compared to the propofol group, the heart rate was significantly higher, and mean RSO Conclusions: Propofol has fewer complications than ketamine and is a good drug for sedating children undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCerebral OximetryKetaminePropofol

Identifiers

PMID36938113
PMCPMC10016124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.