ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Adversarial-based latent space alignment network for left atrial appendage segmentation in transesophageal echocardiography images.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal Characterization of Atrial Fibrillation: From Patient-Specific Anatomy and Electrophysiology to Standardized Atrial Mapping.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Review
- Synthetic artificial intelligence in cardiology: from generative models to clinical applications.European heart journal open · 2026Review
- Deep Learning-Driven Innovations in Echocardiography: Taxonomy, Clinical Impact, Challenges, and Opportunities.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Imaging-defined residual risk after left atrial appendage occlusion: from device surveillance to antithrombotic and reintervention decision considerations.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Interpretable Model for Clinical Use in Left Atrial Appendage Segmentation via an Optimised Deformable-Attention U-Net With Spatial-Channel Fusion.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left atrial appendage (LAA) is a leading cause of atrial fibrillation and thrombosis in cardiovascular disease. Clinicians can rely on LAA occlusion (LAAO) to effectively prevent and treat ischaemic strokes attributed to the LAA. The correct selection of the LAAO is one of the most critical stages in the successful surgical process, which relies on the quantification of the anatomical structure of the LAA for successful intervention in LAAO. In this paper, we propose an adversarial-based latent space alignment framework for LAA segmentation in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images by introducing prior knowledge from the label. The proposed method consists of an LAA segmentation network, a label reconstruction network, and a latent space alignment loss. To be specific, we first employ ConvNeXt as the backbone of the segmentation and reconstruction network to enhance the feature extraction capability of the encoder. The label reconstruction network then encodes the prior shape features from the LAA labels to the latent space. The latent space alignment loss consists of the adversarial-based alignment and the contrast learning losses. It can motivate the segmentation network to learn the prior shape features of the labels, thus improving the accuracy of LAA edge segmentation. The proposed method was evaluated on a TEE dataset including 1,783 images and the experimental results showed that the proposed method outperformed other state-of-the-art LAA segmentation methods with Dice coefficient, AUC, ACC, G-mean, and Kappa of 0.831, 0.917, 0.989, 0.911, and 0.825, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.