Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36937791›Full record

ReviewACS energy letters2023

Catalyst Stability Considerations for Electrochemical Energy Conversion with Non-Noble Metals: Do We Measure on What We Synthesized?

Degenhart Hochfilzer, Ib Chorkendorff, Jakob Kibsgaard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS energy letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Electrolyte Effects in Membrane-Electrode-Assembly CO Electrolysis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  7. Progress in Cu-Based Catalyst Design for Sustained Electrocatalytic COAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Partial Exsolution Enables Superior Bifunctionality of Ir@SrIrOAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Degenhart HochfilzerSurface Physics and Catalysis, Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3654-909X
Ib ChorkendorffSurface Physics and Catalysis, Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2738-0325
Jakob KibsgaardSurface Physics and Catalysis, Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9219-816X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working with non-noble electrocatalysts poses significant experimental challenges to unambiguously evaluate their intrinsic activity and characterize their working state and possible structural and compositional changes before, during, and after activity testing. Despite the vast number of studies on non-noble catalysts, these issues are still not addressed sufficiently-hindering significant progress in the field. In this Perspective, we present pitfalls and challenges when working with non-noble-metal-based electrocatalysts from catalyst synthesis, over electrochemical testing, to post-reaction characterization, and suggest potential solutions to overcome these difficulties. We believe that reliable measurements of the intrinsic activity of non-noble-metal-based electrocatalysts will greatly enhance our understanding of electrocatalysis in general and is a prerequisite for developing more active and selective electrocatalysts.

Identifiers

PMID36937791
PMCPMC10012258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.