ArticleDigital health
Pathologists' acceptance of telepathology in the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs Hospitals in Saudi Arabia: A survey study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Telepathology Development and Stakeholder Perspectives in China: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Digital Pathology in South Africa: A Survey and Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Current Level of Use and Comparison With the International Community.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2025Article
- Pathologists' user experience in the era of digital pathology: a KAP study in a region of emerging digitization.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Paediatric COVID-19 Outcomes: Haematology Parameters, Mortality Rates, and Hospitalization Duration.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Evaluating users' attitudes and acceptance of telemedicine in the early phases of implementation is critical in predicting a successful adoption and utilization of the service. Telepathology does not require a patient's presence for intercommunication; therefore, it is essential to focus on the acceptance of the main occupational groups that are involved. This study aimed to assess the attitude and acceptance of telepathology in the pathology departments of the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA) hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Method: A cross-sectional survey was distributed among pathologists and laboratory technologists in the pathology departments of MNGHA hospitals ( Results: In total, 64 questionnaires were completed (response rate of 82%). The acceptance levels represented by the median responses to the TAM constructs, varied from 5.5 (slightly agree) to 6 (agree). The availability of digital pathology services in the workplace was significantly correlated with the participants' acceptance of telepathology. There was a strong correlation between ITU and PU and a moderate correlation between PEU and PU. Conclusion: Results suggest that telepathology is more likely to be adopted if it is considered helpful, therefore, it is recommended to focus on its usefulness and direct benefits during the training period. The participants who were familiar with the concept of digital pathology were more receptive to using telepathology, which might emphasize the importance of introducing and familiarizing the resident with digital health during their training period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.