Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36937678›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Response inhibition in children with different subtypes/presentations of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Yike Zhu, Siqi Liu, Fan Zhang, Yongying Ren, Tingyu Zhang, Jing Sun, Xin Wang, Lin Wang, Jian Yang

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yike ZhuCenter of Children's Healthcare, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Siqi LiuDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Fan ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Yongying RenDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Tingyu ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Jing SunDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Xin WangDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Lin WangCenter of Children's Healthcare, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Jian YangDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Capital Institute of Pediatrics · CNThe Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Executive dysfunction in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is thought to be closely related to the prefrontal cortex (PFC). However, there is controversy over the activation of the PFC in children with ADHD. Differences could be related to the subtype. Meanwhile, no study to date has used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to explore the differences between subtypes. Thus, this study aimed to explore the activation of the PFC in children with different subtypes of ADHD during executive function task. Methods: Participants in this study include typically developing (TD) children ( Results: Both TD and ADHD children activated the right PFC [middle frontal gyrus (MFG) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG)] during response inhibition. However, the range and degree of activation differed among these groups. Compared with TD children, those with ADHD-PI had a smaller extent of activation in the right PFC, and those with ADHD-C only had a tendency to enhance activation. In addition, children with ADHD-PI and ADHD-C had impaired activation of the temporal gyrus. Besides, compared with ADHD-C and TD, those with ADHD-PI also had impaired activation of the right precentral gyrus (PG), and the supplementary motor area (SMA). Compared with ADHD-PI, ADHD-C showed decreased activation of the right MFG. The activation of Ch34 (BA44, rPFC) in children with ADHD-PI and ADHD-C was negatively correlated with their clinical symptoms. Conclusion: The activation of the PFC in children with different subtypes of ADHD has both commonalities and differences. The degree of activation of the right PFC Ch34 in children with ADHD is negatively correlated with clinical symptoms. fNIRS could be served as a candidate hemodynamic biomarker for the diagnosis of ADHD.

Indexed as

ADHDchildrenfunctional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)PFCresponse inhibitionsubtype

Identifiers

PMID36937678
PMCPMC10017865
OpenAlexW4322772878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read4
measurements read106
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.