Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36937567›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience2023

Memory retrieval, reconsolidation, and extinction: Exploring the boundary conditions of post-conditioning cue exposure.

Nicole C Ferrara, Janine L Kwapis, Sydney Trask

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Structural Updating and the Limits of Inference in Cognitive Change.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole C FerraraDiscipline of Physiology and Biophysics, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, IL, United States.
Janine L KwapisDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Sydney TraskDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.

Funding

Diurnal control of memory allocation by the circadian gene Per1R01AG074041 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI JANINE LYNN KWAPIS · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG074041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following fear conditioning, behavior can be reduced by giving many CS-alone presentations in a process known as extinction or by presenting a few CS-alone presentations and interfering with subsequent memory reconsolidation. While the two share procedural similarities, both the behavioral outcomes and the neurobiological underpinnings are distinct. Here we review the neural and behavioral mechanisms that produce these separate behavioral reductions, as well as some factors that determine whether or not a retrieval-dependent reconsolidation process or an extinction process will be in effect.

Indexed as

amygdalaextinctionfearmemoryreconsolidation

Identifiers

PMID36937567
PMCPMC10017482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read4
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.