ArticleNAR cancer2023
Discovering cryptic splice mutations in cancers via a deep neural network framework.
Article in NAR cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling splicing disruptions due to common somatic variants in acute myeloid leukemia.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Antisense oligonucleotide therapy for patients with Friedreich's ataxia carrying the c.165+5G>C splicing mutation.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Somatic mutations can disrupt splicing regulatory elements and have dramatic effects on cancer genes, yet the functional consequences of mutations located in extended splice regions is difficult to predict. Here, we use a deep neural network (SpliceAI) to characterize the landscape of splice-altering mutations in cancer. In our in-house series of 401 liver cancers, SpliceAI uncovers 1244 cryptic splice mutations, located outside essential splice sites, that validate at a high rate (66%) in matched RNA-seq data. We then extend the analysis to a large pan-cancer cohort of 17 714 tumors, revealing >100 000 cryptic splice mutations. Taking into account these mutations increases the power of driver gene discovery, revealing 126 new candidate driver genes. It also reveals new driver mutations in known cancer genes, doubling the frequency of splice alterations in tumor suppressor genes. Mutational signature analysis suggests mutational processes that could give rise preferentially to splice mutations in each cancer type, with an enrichment of signatures related to clock-like processes and DNA repair deficiency. Altogether, this work sheds light on the causes and impact of cryptic splice mutations in cancer, and highlights the power of deep learning approaches to better annotate the functional consequences of mutations in oncology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.