ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Case Report: A rare case of gastric-type adenocarcinoma of stumps of duplicated cervices in a 49-year-old woman: A case with hidden focus confused us a lot.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a systematic review.AJOG global reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (G-EAC) is a rare special type of cervical mucinous adenocarcinomas, and it is reported the incidence is unrelated to human papilloma virus infection. We report a rare case of G-EAC in stumps of duplicated cervices in a 49-year-old female patient. The woman complained of post-coital bleeding. She had a didelphic uterus with a duplex cervix, and had undergone subtotal hysterectomy 16 years ago. Gynecological examination revealed a normal-appearing right cervix, but the non-dominant side of the left cervix, which was buried and covered by the side wall of the left vagina, was difficult to view. After exposing, the left side cervix presented a mature appearance which was smaller than a normal cervix. Her serum carbohydrate antigen-19-9 levels was 112.59 U/ml. The right cervix's cytology was normal, whereas the left cervix had unusual glandular epithelial cells. HPV testing on both cervical smears was negative. Adenocarcinoma was identified at 3, 6, 12 o'clock at the right cervix in a colposcopy-directed punch biopsy, while no abnormality was found in the biopsy of the left cervix, nor in the curettage of the double cervices. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed two cervical canals, with a 1.9cm×1.6cm mass inside the left cervix, and the left wall of the right cervix may be involved by the tumor of the left cervix. After much deliberation, we considered that the patient had adenocarcinoma of the left cervix stage IB1. Then, the patient underwent radical cervical resection with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Her final histopathology indicated G-EAC of the duplicated cervices. After surgery, she received concurrent chemoradiation. Currently, 29 months after the final chemotherapy was administered, the patient remains healthy. Because G-EAC with duplicated cervices is an uncommon cunning tumor with a bad prognosis, early identification and therapy are recommended to enhance the prognosis. The comprehensive evaluation of symptoms and gynecological examination with cervical cytology, colposcopy-directed punch biopsy, endocervical curettage and MRI examine together may assist in determining an accurate preoperative diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.