Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36937439›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Comprehensive analysis of autophagy-related clusters and individual risk model for immunotherapy response prediction in gastric cancer.

Yanxin Yao, Xin Hu, Junfu Ma, Liuxing Wu, Ye Tian, Kexin Chen, Ben Liu

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanxin YaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology of Tianjin, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xin HuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology of Tianjin, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Junfu MaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology of Tianjin, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Liuxing WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology of Tianjin, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Ye TianDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology of Tianjin, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Kexin ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology of Tianjin, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Ben LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology of Tianjin, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Autophagy can be triggered by oxidative stress and is a double-edged sword involved in the progression of multiple malignancies. However, the precise roles of autophagy on immune response in gastric cancer (GC) remain clarified. Methods: We endeavor to explore the novel autophagy-related clusters and develop a multi-gene signature for predicting the prognosis and the response to immunotherapy in GC. A total of 1505 patients from eight GC cohorts were categorized into two subtypes using consensus clustering. We compare the differences between clusters by the multi-omics approach. Cox and LASSO regression models were used to construct the prognostic signature. Results: Two distinct clusters were identified. Compared with cluster 2, the patients in cluster 1 have favorable survival outcomes and lower scores for epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The two subtypes are further characterized by high heterogeneity concerning immune cell infiltration, somatic mutation pattern, and pathway activity by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). We obtained 21 autophagy-related differential expression genes (DEGs), in which PTK6 amplification and BCL2/CDKN2A deletion were highly prevalent. The four-gene (PEA15, HSPB8, BNIP3, and GABARAPL1) risk signature was further constructed with good predictive performance and validated in 3 independent datasets including our local Tianjin cohort. The risk score was proved to be independent prognostic factor. A prognostic nomogram showed robust validity of GC survival. The risk score was significantly associated with immune cell infiltration status, tumor mutation burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and immune checkpoint molecules. Furthermore, the model was efficient for predicting the response to tumor-targeted agent and immunotherapy and verified by the IMvigor210 cohort. This model is also capable of discriminating between low and high-risk patients receiving chemotherapy. Conclusion: Altogether, our exploratory research on the landscape of autophagy-related patterns may shed light on individualized therapies and prognosis in GC.

Indexed as

autophagy-related genesgastric cancerimmunotherapyoxidative stressprognostic signature

Identifiers

PMID36937439
PMCPMC10022822
OpenAlexW4323045857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read12
table measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.