Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36937394›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2023

Prognostic value of nectin-4 in human cancers: A meta-analysis.

Rongqiang Liu, Kailiang Zhao, Kunpeng Wang, Lilong Zhang, Wangbin Ma, Zhengdong Qiu, Weixing Wang

Open access · goldFull text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A pilot study of nectin-4-targeted radioligand [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Predictive Biomarkers of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Efficacy for Solid Tumors: Current Challenges and the Potential Role of Quantitative Proteomics.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rongqiang LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Kailiang ZhaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Kunpeng WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lilong ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wangbin MaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhengdong QiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Weixing WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many reports have described that abnormal nectin-4 expression may be used as a prognostic marker in many tumors. However, these studies failed to reach a consensus. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic value of nectin-4 in cancers. Methods: Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of science until August 31, 2022. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the relationship between nectin-4 expression and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival/progression-free survival/relapse-free survival (DFS/PFS/RFS). Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were applied to assess the relationship between nectin-4 expression and clinicopathologic features. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis and funnel plot were used to test the reliability of the results. All data analyses were performed using STATA version 12.0 software. Results: Fifteen articles involving 2245 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed that high nectin-4 expression was significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.35-2.28). There was no relationship between high nectin-4 expression and DFS/PFS/RFS (HR: 178, 95% CI: 0.78-4.08).Subgroup analyses revealed that that high nectin-4 expression mainly presented adverse OS in esophageal cancer (EC) (HR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.30-2.44) and gastric cancer (GC) (HR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.43-2.58). We also found that high nectin-4 expression was associated with tumor diameter (big vs small) (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.02-3.75), tumor stage (III-IV vs I-II) (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.01-4.12) and invasion depth (T3+T4 vs T2+T1) (OR: 3.95, 95% CI: 2.06-7.57). Conclusions: Nectin-4 can be used as an effective prognostic indicator for specific cancers.

Indexed as

cancermeta-analysisnectin-4prognosissurvival outcome

Identifiers

PMID36937394
PMCPMC10020226
OpenAlexW4323045520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read28
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.