Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36937392›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Intrafraction tumor motion monitoring and dose reconstruction for liver pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Saber Nankali, Esben Schjødt Worm, Jakob Borup Thomsen, Line Bjerregaard Stick, Jenny Bertholet, Morten Høyer, Britta Weber, Hanna Rahbek Mortensen, Per Rugaard Poulsen

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Saber NankaliDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Esben Schjødt WormDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jakob Borup ThomsenDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Line Bjerregaard StickDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jenny BertholetDivision of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Morten HøyerDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Britta WeberDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hanna Rahbek MortensenDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Per Rugaard PoulsenDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAarhus University · DKUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy can provide highly conformal target dose distributions and healthy tissue sparing. However, proton therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is prone to dosimetrical uncertainties induced by respiratory motion. This study aims to develop intra-treatment tumor motion monitoring during respiratory gated proton therapy and combine it with motion-including dose reconstruction to estimate the delivered tumor doses for individual HCC treatment fractions. Methods: Three HCC-patients were planned to receive 58 GyRBE (n=2) or 67.5 GyRBE (n=1) of exhale respiratory gated PBS proton therapy in 15 fractions. The treatment planning was based on the exhale phase of a 4-dimensional CT scan. Daily setup was based on cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging of three implanted fiducial markers. An external marker block (RPM) on the patient's abdomen was used for exhale gating in free breathing. This study was based on 5 fractions (patient 1), 1 fraction (patient 2) and 6 fractions (patient 3) where a post-treatment control CBCT was available. After treatment, segmented 2D marker positions in the post-treatment CBCT projections provided the estimated 3D motion trajectory during the CBCT by a probability-based method. An external-internal correlation model (ECM) that estimated the tumor motion from the RPM motion was built from the synchronized RPM signal and marker motion in the CBCT. The ECM was then used to estimate intra-treatment tumor motion. Finally, the motion-including CTV dose was estimated using a dose reconstruction method that emulates tumor motion in beam's eye view as lateral spot shifts and in-depth motion as changes in the proton beam energy. The CTV homogeneity index (HI) The CTV homogeneity index (HI) was calculated as Results: The tumor position during spot delivery had a root-mean-square error of 1.3 mm in left-right, 2.8 mm in cranio-caudal and 1.7 mm in anterior-posterior directions compared to the planned position. On average, the CTV HI was larger than planned by 3.7%-points (range: 1.0-6.6%-points) for individual fractions and by 0.7%-points (range: 0.3-1.1%-points) for the average dose of 5 or 6 fractions. Conclusions: A method to estimate internal tumor motion and reconstruct the motion-including fraction dose for PBS proton therapy of HCC was developed and demonstrated successfully clinically.

Indexed as

dose reconstructionliver cancermotion managementpencil beam scanningproton therapyrespiratory gatingtumor motion monitoring (Min.5-Max. 8)

Identifiers

PMID36937392
PMCPMC10019817
OpenAlexW4322772653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read23
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.