Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36937351›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2023

Nutritional evaluation of some potential wild edible plants of North Eastern region of India.

Hammylliende Talang, Aabon Yanthan, Ranbir Singh Rathi, Kanakasabapathi Pradheep, Soyimchiten Longkumer, Bendangla Imsong, Laishram Hemanta Singh, Ruth S Assumi, M Bilashini Devi, Vanlalruati and 4 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wild vegetables contribute to improving the diversity and sustainability of vegetable diets in China.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hammylliende TalangICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, India.
Aabon YanthanICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Nagaland Centre, Medziphema, Nagaland, India.
Ranbir Singh RathiICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Kanakasabapathi PradheepICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Soyimchiten LongkumerICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Bendangla ImsongICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Nagaland Centre, Medziphema, Nagaland, India.
Laishram Hemanta SinghSchool of Agricultural Sciences and Rural Development, Medziphema, Nagaland, India.
Ruth S AssumiICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, India.
M Bilashini DeviICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, India.
VanlalruatiICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, India.
Ashok KumarICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Sudhir Pal AhlawatICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Kailash C BhattICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Rakesh BhardwajICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: India's north-eastern hill region (NEH) is one of the biodiversity hotspots, inhabited by several tribal communities still maintaining their traditional food habits. Much of their food resources are drawn from wild sources. Materials and methods: Fourteen species of wild edible plants of high ethnic importance were collected from remote localities of Nagaland and Meghalaya states of the NEH region of India for nutritional profiling. Nutritional profiling of leaves of six species comprising Results and discussion: The range of variation in proximate composition was observed for moisture (72-92%), protein (1.71-6.66%), fat (0.22-1.36%), dietary fibre (5.16-14.58%), sugar (0.30-3.41%), and starch (0.07-2.14%). The highest protein content (6.66%) was recorded in

Indexed as

antioxidantsbiodiversityethnic foodsmineralsproximate composition

Identifiers

PMID36937351
PMCPMC10014872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read139
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.