ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2023
Mini review: STING activation during non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of cGAS-STING pathway in liver disease: the quest continues.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- METTL14 Downregulation Accelerates HBV-Related Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Promoting Type I Interferon Release via the cGAS-STING Pathway Through mJournal of medical virology · 2026Article
- CRISPLD2 protects against liver inflammation and fibrosis via GRP78 to repress HMGB1/TLR4 axis-mediated STING palmitoylation.Hepatology communications · 2026Article
- Therapeutic potential of β-sitosterol in methotrexate-induced liver injury: association with STING and ERK-1 pathways.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- The commoneLife · 2024Article
- The commonbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common chronic diseases serving as a major threat to human health. While the pathogenesis of NAFLD is multi-factorial, inflammation is considered a critical factor driving the development and progression of NAFLD phenotype, including liver fibrosis. As an essential mediator of innate immunity, stimulator of interferon genes (STING) functions to promote anti-viral immunity. Accumulating evidence also indicates that STING functions to promote the proinflammatory activation of several types of liver cells, especially macrophages/Kupffer cells, in a manner independent of interferon production. Over the past several years, a significant body of literature has validated a detrimental role for STING in regulating the pathogenesis of hepatic steatosis and inflammation. In particular, the STING in macrophages/Kupffer cells has attracted much attention due to its importance in not only enhancing macrophage proinflammatory activation, but also generating macrophage-derived mediators to increase hepatocyte fat deposition and proinflammatory responses, and to activate hepatic stellate cell fibrogenic activation. Both intracellular and extracellular signals are participating in STING activation in macrophages, thereby critically contributing to NAFLD phenotype. This mini review summarizes recent advances on how STING is activated in macrophages in the context of NAFLD pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.