Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36937316›Full record

ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2023

Diagnostic value of liquid biopsy in the era of precision medicine: 10 years of clinical evidence in cancer.

Vincenza Caputo, Fortunato Ciardiello, Carminia Maria Della Corte, Giulia Martini, Teresa Troiani, Stefania Napolitano

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vincenza CaputoMedical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8750-4492
Fortunato CiardielloMedical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3369-4841
Carminia Maria Della CorteMedical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3396-8099
Giulia MartiniMedical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4093-2681
Teresa TroianiMedical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0646-4901
Stefania NapolitanoMedical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3504-8349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy is a diagnostic repeatable test, which in last years has emerged as a powerful tool for profiling cancer genomes in real-time with minimal invasiveness and tailoring oncological decision-making. It analyzes different blood-circulating biomarkers and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is the preferred one. Nevertheless, tissue biopsy remains the gold standard for molecular evaluation of solid tumors whereas liquid biopsy is a complementary tool in many different clinical settings, such as treatment selection, monitoring treatment response, cancer clonal evolution, prognostic evaluation, as well as the detection of early disease and minimal residual disease (MRD). A wide number of technologies have been developed with the aim of increasing their sensitivity and specificity with acceptable costs. Moreover, several preclinical and clinical studies have been conducted to better understand liquid biopsy clinical utility. Anyway, several issues are still a limitation of its use such as false positive and negative results, results interpretation, and standardization of the panel tests. Although there has been rapid development of the research in these fields and recent advances in the clinical setting, many clinical trials and studies are still needed to make liquid biopsy an instrument of clinical routine. This review provides an overview of the current and future clinical applications and opening questions of liquid biopsy in different oncological settings, with particular attention to ctDNA liquid biopsy.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNAclinical trialsLiquid biopsyminimal residual diseaseprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID36937316
PMCPMC10017193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read22
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.