ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Phylogeny and systematics of the genus
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- The fellowship of the ring: species-associated effects of fairy ring fungi on soil, microbiota, and vegetation in a managed ornamental grassland.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Taxonomy, phylogeny, and evolutionary diversification of spider-pathogenic fungi from China (IMA fungus · 2026Article
- Intergenerational and horizontal transmission of wheat endophytic fungi.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Isolation of a native strain of Clonostachys rosea with insecticidal, antiphytopathogenic, and endophytic activities.Archives of microbiology · 2025Article
- Studies on the epipolythiodioxopiperazine alkaloid verticillin D: Scaled production, streamlined purification, and absolute configuration.Phytochemistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Phylogenetic evidence reveal a close relationship betweenMycoKeys · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- RevisingStudies in mycology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods and Results: In the present study, a phylogenetic framework is reconstructed for the family Bionectriaceae focusing on Discussion: Moreover, the genetic divergence comparisons of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.