ArticleJournal of pain research2023
Bibliometrics Analysis and Visualization of Sarcopenia Associated with Osteoporosis from 2000 to 2022.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smart biomaterials for skeletal aging repair and regeneration.Bone research · 2026Review
- Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications of the sympathetic nervous system in bone-related disorders: a brain-bone axis perspective.Bone research · 2025Review
- Research Status and Hot Spot Visualization Analysis of Osteoporosis from 2014 to 2025.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Progress in understanding the role and mechanism of miRNAs in osteoporosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Systems biology and experimental validation indicate DDIT4, FOXO1, and STAT3 as shared key genes linking osteoporosis and sarcopenia.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Causal inference study of plasma proteins and blood metabolites mediating the effect of obesity-related indicators on osteoporosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Definitions and adverse outcomes of sarcopenia in older patients in orthopedic and trauma care: A scoping review on current evidence.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- Advancements and emerging trends in ophthalmic anti-VEGF therapy: a bibliometric analysis.International ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Scientometric analysis of global publications on prediabetes and osteoporosis: 1994-2023.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Review
- Development and validation of a predicative model for identifying sarcopenia in Chinese adults using nutrition indicators (AHLC).Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Understanding the Complexity of Hypertension with Sarcopenia by Scientometric Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Osteoporosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Recent years have seen an increased awareness of sarcopenia in the cross field of osteoporosis and sarcopenia. The goal of this study was to evaluate current bibliometric characteristics and the status of cross-sectional studies between osteoporosis and sarcopenia. Methods: Publications related to osteoporosis and sarcopenia published between January 2000 and November 2022 were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection; bibliometric and visualization were performed by Microsoft Office Excel, VOSviewer, Citespace, and R. Results: A total of 1128 documents written by 5791 authors from 1758 organizations in 62 countries and published in 405 journals were identified. USA was the leading country with the highest publication and total citation. University of Melbourne contributed the most publications, while Tufts University had the largest citations. Osteoporosis International was the most influential journals in this field with the highest publications, citations and H index. Cooper C was the most influential author, who published the 20 studies, had the highest local citations and the highest H index. The keywords were classified into 6 clusters: Cluster 1 (aging), Cluster 2 (frailty) and Cluster 3 (osteosarcopenia). Conclusion: Our bibliometric results revealed that the global osteoporosis and sarcopenia-related research increased rapidly from 2000 to 2022, suggesting it was a promising area of research for the future. The future trends in the cross field of sarcopenia and osteoporosis would be the molecular mechanisms of crosstalk between muscles and bones, safety and efficacy interventions with a dual effect on muscle and bone and osteosarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.