Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36937167›Full record

Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Defocus Curve of Emerging Presbyopic Patients.

Brian M Shafer, Keeley Puls-Boever, John P Berdahl, Vance Thompson, Mitch J Ibach, Larae L Zimprich, Justin A Schweitzer

Abstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Subjective Accommodative Function and Defocus Curve Metrics in Phakic Adults Aged 45-65 Years.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brian M ShaferDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chester County Eye Care, Malvern, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8003-2333
Keeley Puls-BoeverDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8912-7005
John P BerdahlDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5468-7405
Vance ThompsonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Mitch J IbachDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6504-1781
Larae L ZimprichDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3851-5870
Justin A SchweitzerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To create a defocus curve of emerging presbyopic patients of various age groups. Setting: Single site private practice in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Design: This was a non-randomized, prospective study. All subjects were enrolled from healthy volunteers. Methods: Subjects aged 37-9, 40-42, 43-45 and 46-48 that have 20/20 best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) were included. Binocular visual acuity at different defocus steps ranging from +0.5 D to -3 D was measured in each age group. Defocus curves were generated from the mean logMAR visual acuities at each defocus step, by age group. Results: Of the 60 subjects, 23.3% of subjects were between the ages of 37-39, 26.7% were between the ages of 40-42, 25% of subjects were between ages 43-45, and 25% were between the ages of 46-48. Visual acuity significantly decreased from plano to -3 D defocus steps in all groups (p < 0.0002, p = 0, p = 0 and p = 0). The 46-48-year-old group had worse visual acuity compared to the other three groups from the -1.0 to -2.0 D defocus steps (p = 0.037, p = 0.022 and 0.017, respectively). Starting at a near point of 40cm, the 37-39 group had the best logMAR vision and the 46-48 group had the worst vision (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The defocus curves of emerging presbyopic individuals demonstrate a decreasing visual acuity at near defocus steps that decreases with age. Defocus curves at different age ranges can help doctors explain various presbyopia treatment options in terms of near point capabilities at various ages.

Indexed as

advanced technology IOLsdefocus curvespresbyopia

Identifiers

PMID36937167
PMCPMC10022518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.