Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36937136›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602023

Crohn's Disease Patient Experiences and Preferences With Disease Monitoring: An International Qualitative Study.

Noelle Rohatinsky, Sandra Zelinsky, Michael Dolinger, Britt Christensen, Rune Wilkens, Shellie Radford, Marla Dubinsky, Kerri Novak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Refractory Crohn's Disease: Perspectives, Unmet Needs and Innovations.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  12. The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Access to and Models of Care.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Noelle RohatinskyCollege of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-027X
Sandra ZelinskyUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michael DolingerDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9023-4948
Britt ChristensenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne Medicine, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8746-4275
Rune WilkensGastrounit, Division of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4928-4708
Shellie RadfordNottingham Biomedical Research Centre and Clinical Research Facility, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2226-0810
Marla DubinskyDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Kerri NovakDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4164-7321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Strategies incorporating objective disease monitoring in Crohn's disease (CD), beyond clinical symptoms are important to improve patient outcomes. Little evidence exists to explore patient understanding of CD treatment goals, nor preferences and experiences with monitoring options. This qualitative study aimed to explore patient experiences and preferences of CD monitoring to inform monitoring strategies, improve patient engagement, and optimize a patient-centered approach to care. Methods: This study used a patient-oriented, qualitative descriptive design. Convenience and snowball sampling were used to recruit adult participants diagnosed with CD who had experience with at least 2 types of disease monitoring. Online focus groups were conducted and data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: This international study included 37 participants from Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, and the United States. Overall, participants preferred more noninvasive types of monitoring [eg, intestinal ultrasound (IUS)] but were willing to undergo more invasive monitoring (eg, colonoscopy) if required. To improve disease monitoring, participants wanted increased access to IUS, establishment of a patient-centered interdisciplinary team and access to information and self-testing. Participants identified challenges with communication between patients and providers and stressed the importance of participating in shared decision making and being equal team members in their care. Conclusions: It is imperative to incorporate patient-driven preferences into how we can best structure monitoring strategies, to ensure equitable access to those preferred modalities and embrace a shared decision-making approach to disease management in CD.

Indexed as

Crohn’s diseasedisease monitoringpatient-oriented researchqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36937136
PMCPMC10022708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.