Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36937083›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2022

Early Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Women Undergoing Elective and Emergent Caesarian Section under General Anaesthesia: A Comparative Study.

Mahmoud Hussein Bahr, Amira Fouad Elgamel, Ahmed Goda Ahmed, Mohamed Abdelkader

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahmoud Hussein BahrFaculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6875-2060
Amira Fouad ElgamelFaculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6743-432X
Ahmed Goda AhmedFaculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1633-0915
Mohamed AbdelkaderFaculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
Beni-Suef University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) following cesarean section (CS) is a growing and underestimated problem with unknown mechanisms. Studies suggest that general anesthesia (GA) plays a role in the development of early POCD. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the incidence of early POCD after elective and emergent CS under GA. Methods: We assessed the difference between the elective and emergent groups regarding the mini-mental state examination (MMSE), hemodynamic effects such as mean blood pressure (MBP), and heart rate (HR). Paired Results: MMSE one hour after the operation was significantly lower than preoperative MMSE in the emergent group, and the MMSE tended to return to normal values faster in the elective than in the emergent group. Moreover, we found a significantly lower MBP and higher HR (at 15, 30, and 45 minutes) in both groups compared to preoperative values. Regarding intergroup comparison, MBP (at 30 minutes) significantly decreased in the elective group compared to the emergent group. Conclusions: There was a significantly lower POCD, especially at the first hour postoperatively, in the elective CS than in the emergent CS. Elective CS might have a positive effect on the women's health as a mode of delivery.

Indexed as

General AnesthesiaObstetric AnesthesiaPerioperative CarePostoperative Cognitive DysfunctionPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36937083
PMCPMC10016137
OpenAlexW4320073166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.