ArticleFrontiers in big data2023
A proposed scenario to improve the Ncut algorithm in segmentation.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In image segmentation, there are many methods to accomplish the result of segmenting an image into k clusters. However, the number of clusters k is always defined before running the process. It is defined by some observation or knowledge based on the application. In this paper, we propose a new scenario in order to define the value k clusters automatically using histogram information. This scenario is applied to Ncut algorithm and speeds up the running time by using CUDA language to parallel computing in GPU. The Ncut is improved in four steps: determination of number of clusters in segmentation, computing the similarity matrix W, computing the similarity matrix's eigenvalues, and grouping on the Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering algorithm. Some experimental results are shown to prove that our scenario is 20 times faster than the Ncut algorithm while keeping the same accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.