Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936964›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2023

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in older adults.

Kun Xu, Zihan Wang, Maorong Qin, Yangyu Gao, Na Luo, Wanting Xie, Yihan Zou, Jie Wang, Xingming Ma

Open access · goldFull text readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kun XuSchool of Health Management, Xihua University, Chengdu, China.
Zihan WangFaculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
Maorong QinSchool of Health Management, Xihua University, Chengdu, China.
Yangyu GaoSchool of Health Management, Xihua University, Chengdu, China.
Na LuoSchool of Health Management, Xihua University, Chengdu, China.
Wanting XieSchool of Health Management, Xihua University, Chengdu, China.
Yihan ZouSchool of Health Management, Xihua University, Chengdu, China.
Jie WangSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, China.
Xingming MaSchool of Health Management, Xihua University, Chengdu, China.
Xihua University · CNSouthwest Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, vaccinations were essential in preventing COVID-19 infections and related mortality in older adults. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines in older adults. We systematically searched the electronic bibliographic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Research Square, and OpenGrey, as well as other sources of gray literature, for studies published between January 1, 2020, and October 1, 2022. We retrieved 22 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a total of 3,404,696 older adults (aged over 60 years) participating, that were included in the meta-analysis. No significant publication bias was found. In the cumulative meta-analysis, we found that the COVID-19 vaccines were effective in preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.23-0.65, Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022319698, identifier CRD42022319698.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAgedHumansMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccineeffectivenessmeta-analysisolder adultssafetySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36936964
PMCPMC10020204
OpenAlexW4323045256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read63
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.