Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936943›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Strategies for optimizing CITE-seq for human islets and other tissues.

Sarah J Colpitts, Matthew A Budd, Mahdis Monajemi, Kyle T Reid, Julia M Murphy, Sabine Ivison, C Bruce Verchere, Megan K Levings, Sarah Q Crome

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah J ColpittsDepartment of Immunology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Matthew A BuddDepartment of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mahdis MonajemiDepartment of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kyle T ReidDepartment of Immunology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Julia M MurphyDepartment of Immunology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sabine IvisonDepartment of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
C Bruce VerchereDepartment of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Megan K LevingsDepartment of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sarah Q CromeDepartment of Immunology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CABC Children's Hospital · CAToronto General Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defining the immunological landscape of human tissue is an important area of research, but challenges include the impact of tissue disaggregation on cell phenotypes and the low abundance of immune cells in many tissues. Here, we describe methods to troubleshoot and standardize Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq) for studies involving enzymatic digestion of human tissue. We tested epitope susceptibility of 92 antibodies commonly used to differentiate immune lineages and cell states on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells following treatment with an enzymatic digestion cocktail used to isolate islets. We observed CD4, CD8a, CD25, CD27, CD120b, CCR4, CCR6, and PD1 display significant sensitivity to enzymatic treatment, effects that often could not be overcome with alternate antibodies. Comparison of flow cytometry-based CITE-seq antibody titrations and sequencing data supports that for the majority of antibodies, flow cytometry accurately predicts optimal antibody concentrations for CITE-seq. Comparison by CITE-seq of immune cells in enzymatically digested islet tissue and donor-matched spleen not treated with enzymes revealed little digestion-induced epitope cleavage, suggesting increased sensitivity of CITE-seq and/or that the islet structure may protect resident immune cells from enzymes. Within islets, CITE-seq identified immune cells difficult to identify by transcriptional signatures alone, such as distinct tissue-resident T cell subsets, mast cells, and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). Collectively this study identifies strategies for the rational design and testing of CITE-seq antibodies for single-cell studies of immune cells within islets and other tissues.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateLeukocytes, MononuclearAntibodiesEpitopesHumansT-Lymphocyte SubsetsAntibodiesEpitopesCITE-seqflow cytometrypancreassingle cell RNA seqtissue immunity

Identifiers

PMID36936943
PMCPMC10014726
OpenAlexW4322744485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read50
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.