Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936889›Full record

ArticleMateria socio-medica2022

The Impact of the Community Psychiatric Treatment Program on the User's Quality of Life - experience of the Study Participants.

Erika Zelko, Danijela Curic Korpar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materia socio-medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erika ZelkoFaculty of Medicine University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Danijela Curic KorparMGA zdr. - soc. manag., Health center Murska Sobota, Murska Sobota, Slovenia.
University of Maribor · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Community psychiatric treatment (CPT) is a novelty in the primary health care system for the people with mental health problems. The service operates according to the Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model. FACT is a rehabilitation-oriented clinical case management model based on the ACT model (Assertive Community Treatment). Objective: This study aimed to assess how involvement in a community psychiatry program affects the quality of life of program participants. Methods: Between December 2020 and March 2021 we conducted a qualitative study. To obtain information, semi-structured interviews with twelve patients treated in the Community Psychiatric Treatment program were conducted. All restriction regarding COVID pandemic were considered at the research. Content analysis of the text was used for data analysis, which means that we interpreted the analysed text and determine the meaning of individual parts of the text. Results: Twelve persons participated in the interviews, six of which were women (50%) and six men (50%). All the participants were of Slovenian nationality. They were from 28 to 80 years old, with a mean age of 47 years. We identified twelve categories and four themes: treatment problems, principles of operating of CPT program, satisfaction with inclusion in the CPT and improvement of quality of life through inclusion in the program. Conclusion: Quality of life is essential for every individual, as well as for people with mental health problems. In our study we have proved that the Community psychiatric programs could significantly impact the quality of life of people with mental health problems.

Indexed as

Community psychiatric treatment programmental healthprimary health carequality of life

Identifiers

PMID36936889
PMCPMC10019875
OpenAlexW4313130067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.