X-ray radiation shielding and microscopic studies of flexible and moldable bandage by

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Progress in Flexible and Wearable Lead-Free Polymer Composites for Radiation Protection.Polymers · 2024
   Review
2. A new method in the production of protective sheets against X-ray radiation.Heliyon · 2024
   Article
3. The regulatory mechanisms of cerium oxide nanoparticles in oxidative stress and emerging applications in refractory wound care.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract