Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936749›Full record

ArticleToxicon: X2023

Availability, accessibility and use of antivenom for snakebite envenomation in Africa with proposed strategies to overcome the limitations.

Mahmood Muazu Dalhat, Julien Potet, Abdulaziz Mohammed, Nafiisah Chotun, Hanna Amanuel Tesfahunei, Abdulrazaq Garba Habib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicon: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Following theSocio-ecological practice research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Computational Strategies for Broad Spectrum Venom Phospholipase AJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mahmood Muazu DalhatInfectious Diseases Control Centre, Kaduna State, Nigeria.
Julien PotetNeglected Tropical Diseases, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Paris, France.
Abdulaziz MohammedDivision of Disease Control and Prevention, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Ethiopia.
Nafiisah ChotunDivision of Disease Control and Prevention, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Ethiopia.
Hanna Amanuel TesfahuneiDivision of Disease Control and Prevention, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Ethiopia.
Abdulrazaq Garba HabibInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Africa remains one of the regions with the highest incident and burden of snakebite. The goal of the World Health Organization to halve the global burden of snakebite by 2030 can only be achieved if sub-optimal access to antivenoms in the most affected regions is addressed. We identified upstream, midstream, and downstream factors along the antivenom value chain that prevent access to antivenoms in the African region. We identified windows of opportunities that could be utilized to ensure availability, accessibility, and affordability for snakebite endemic populations in Africa. These include implementation of multicomponent strategies such as intensified advocacy, community engagement, healthcare worker trainings, and leveraging the institutional and governance structure provided by African governments to address the challenges identified.

Indexed as

AccessibilityAffordabilityAfricaAntivenomsBurdenSnakebite envenoming

Identifiers

PMID36936749
PMCPMC10015232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.