Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936651›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023

Prediction of red blood cell transfusion after orthopedic surgery using an interpretable machine learning framework.

Yifeng Chen, Xiaoyu Cai, Zicheng Cao, Jie Lin, Wenyu Huang, Yuan Zhuang, Lehan Xiao, Xiaozhen Guan, Ying Wang, Xingqiu Xia and 4 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yifeng ChenSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoyu CaiDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zicheng CaoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Jie LinDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wenyu HuangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yuan ZhuangDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lehan XiaoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaozhen GuanDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ying WangThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China.
Xingqiu XiaHealSci Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Feng JiaoGuangzhou Centre for Applied Mathematics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiangjun DuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Guozhi JiangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Deqing WangDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNGuangdong Medical College · CNGuangzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is widely used during the perioperative period but is often associated with a high risk of infection and complications. However, prediction models for RBC transfusion in patients with orthopedic surgery have not yet been developed. We aimed to identify predictors and constructed prediction models for RBC transfusion after orthopedic surgery using interpretable machine learning algorithms. Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed a total of 59,605 patients undergoing orthopedic surgery from June 2013 to January 2019 across 7 tertiary hospitals in China. Patients were randomly split into training (80%) and test subsets (20%). The feature selection method of recursive feature elimination (RFE) was used to identify an optimal feature subset from thirty preoperative variables, and six machine learning algorithms were applied to develop prediction models. The Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) value was employed to evaluate the contribution of each predictor towards the prediction of postoperative RBC transfusion. For simplicity of the clinical utility, a risk score system was further established using the top risk factors identified by machine learning models. Results: Of the 59,605 patients with orthopedic surgery, 19,921 (33.40%) underwent postoperative RBC transfusion. The CatBoost model exhibited an AUC of 0.831 (95% CI: 0.824-0.836) on the test subset, which significantly outperformed five other prediction models. The risk of RBC transfusion was associated with old age (>60 years) and low RBC count (<4.0 × 10 Conclusion: By applying an interpretable machine learning framework in a large-scale multicenter retrospective cohort, we identified novel modifiable risk factors and developed prediction models with good performance for postoperative RBC transfusion in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Our findings may allow more precise identification of high-risk patients for optimal control of risk factors and achieve personalized RBC transfusion for orthopedic patients.

Indexed as

interpretabilitymachine learningorthopedic surgeryprediction modelRBC transfusion

Identifiers

PMID36936651
PMCPMC10017874
OpenAlexW4322772875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read63
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.