Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936645›Full record

Reviewnpj urban sustainability2023

The transformative potential of a Global Urban Agenda and its lessons in a time of crisis.

Jessica Espey, Susan Parnell, Aromar Revi

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in npj urban sustainability, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica EspeyUniversity of Bristol, School of Geographical Sciences, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5140-7463
Susan ParnellUniversity of Bristol, School of Geographical Sciences and African Centre for Cities, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5702-1684
Aromar ReviIndian Institute for Human Settlements, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7712-9262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

2015 was a seismic moment for urban stakeholders around the world. A coalition of policymakers, academics and practitioners came together to successfully advocate for an urban goal to be included in the UN Sustainable Development Goal framework. Although the value of a place-based approach to development has been demonstrated by a number of cities and countries worldwide, it was 2020-2022 (three years of cataclysmic global events) that highlighted the necessity for a universal place-based approach to planning in order to foster resilience and sustainability. In this article, three academic-practitioners reflect upon the transformative potential of the 2015-16 urban agendas.

Indexed as

GeographyPolitics and international relationsSustainability

Identifiers

PMID36936645
PMCPMC10006553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.