Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936599›Full record

ArticleBMJ medicine2022

Severity of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection and perinatal outcomes of women admitted to hospital during the omicron variant dominant period using UK Obstetric Surveillance System data: prospective, national cohort study.

Hilde M Engjom, Rema Ramakrishnan, Nicola Vousden, Kathryn Bunch, Eddie Morris, Nigel A B Simpson, Chris Gale, Patrick O'Brien, Maria Quigley, Peter Brocklehurst and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Severe COVID-19 during pregnancy in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023
    Article
  14. Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 and Variants in Pregnancy.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Hilde M Engjom *Division of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1582-4283
Rema Ramakrishnan *National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Nicola VousdenNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5216-8268
Kathryn BunchNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Eddie MorrisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Nigel A B SimpsonDepartment of Women's & Children's Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Chris GaleNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0707-876X
Patrick O'BrienRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, London, UK.
Maria QuigleyNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Peter BrocklehurstBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Jennifer J KurinczukNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1984-4575
University of Oxford · GBRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBImperial College London · GBNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the severity of maternal infection when the omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant (B.1.1.529) was dominant (15 December 2021 to 14 March 2022) and describe outcomes by symptoms and vaccination status. Design: Prospective, national cohort study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System. Setting: 94 hospitals in the UK with a consultant led maternity unit. Participants: Pregnant women admitted to hospital for any cause with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Main outcome measures: Symptomatic or asymptomatic infection, vaccination status by doses before admission, and severity of maternal infection (moderate or severe infection according to modified World Health Organization's criteria). Results: Of 3699 women who were admitted to hospital, 986 (26.7%, 95% confidence interval 25.3% to 28.1%) had symptoms; of these, 144 (14.6%, 12.5% to 17.0%) had a moderate to severe infection, 99 (10.4%, 8.6% to 12.5%) of 953 received respiratory support, and 30 (3.0%, 2.1% to 4.3%) were admitted to an intensive care unit. Covid-19 specific drug treatment was given to 13 (43.3%) of the 30 women in intensive care. Four women with symptoms died (0.4%, 0.1% to 1.1%). Vaccination status was known for 845 (85.6%) women with symptoms; 489 (58.9%) were unvaccinated and only 55 (6.5%) had three doses. Moderate to severe infection was reported for 93 (19.0%) of 489 unvaccinated women with symptoms, decreasing to three (5.5%) of 55 after three doses. Among the 30 women with symptoms who were admitted to intensive care, 23 (76.7%) were unvaccinated and none had received three doses. Conclusion: Most women with severe covid-19 disease were unvaccinated and vaccine coverage among pregnant women admitted to hospital with SARS-CoV-2 was low. Ongoing action to prioritise and advocate for vaccine uptake in pregnancy is essential. A better understanding of the persistent low use of drug treatments is an urgent priority. Trial registration: ISRCTN 40092247.

Indexed as

COVID-19Infectious disease medicineObstetricsPregnancy complicationsPublic health

Identifiers

PMID36936599
PMCPMC10012856
OpenAlexW4293199535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.