ArticleBMJ medicine2022
Evidence at time of regulatory approval and cost of new antibiotics in 2016-19: cohort study of FDA approved drugs.
Article in BMJ medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurement in Patients With Complicated Intraabdominal Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Pooled it
- Reframing the value of reserve antibiotics: how ultra-orphan reimbursement pathways could offer fair and equitable access to new antibiotics.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- Some Newer Antibiotics Active AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Developing, Analyzing, and Interpreting Outcome Assessments to Improve Endpoints in Infectious Diseases Clinical Research.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Article
- Reserve antibiotics: overcoming limitations of evidence generated from regulatory approval trials.Globalization and health · 2025Review
- National Survey of Factors Associated with Physician Antibiotic Prescribing Preferences.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Innovation in the Design of Clinical Trials for Infectious Diseases: Focusing on Patients Over Pathogens.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Review
- Pulmonary Delivery of Antibiotics to the Lungs: Current State and Future Prospects.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Outcomes of inadequate empiric therapy and timing of newer antibacterial therapy in hospitalized adults with culture-positive Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a multicenter analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Antibiotic Development: Lessons from the Past and Future Opportunities.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Review
- Guiding antimicrobial stewardship through thoughtful antimicrobial susceptibility testing and reporting strategies: an updated approach in 2023.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- A Comparative Assessment of Approvals and Discontinuations of Systemic Antibiotics and Other Therapeutic Areas.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Perspectives of US Adults on Antimicrobial Trials With Noninferiority Designs.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Global Pull Incentives for Better Antibacterials: The UK Leads the Way.Applied health economics and health policy · 2023Article
- Focusing on antimicrobial resistant infections -are we missing the forest for the trees and the patients for pathogens?Frontiers in antibiotics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the clinical evidence, regulatory background, and cost of antibiotics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2016-19. Design: Cohort study of FDA approved drugs. Data sources: FDA databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and drug labelling. Launch prices were extracted from IBM Micromedex Red Book. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Antibiotics approved by the FDA from October 2016 to December 2019 were identified, and key features of their clinical development were extracted from publicly available FDA databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and drug labelling. Launch prices were extracted from IBM Micromedex Red Book to evaluate the cost of treatment against comparators. Results: 15 new antibiotics received at least one special regulatory designation and were supported by a median of two pivotal trials. More than half of the pivotal trials used an active control non-inferiority design. All drugs were approved based on surrogate outcome measures. 52 postmarketing requirements and commitments were included across the cohort (median 3 for each drug). From January 2021, 27 postmarketing requirements and commitments were listed as pending, seven as ongoing, three as delayed, one as submitted, eight as released, and four as fulfilled. The most expensive new antibiotic was pretomanid at $36 399 (£29 618; €34 582) for a course of treatment, and the least expensive was rifamycin ($176). Cost ratios between study drugs and comparators ranged from 0.48 to 134. Conclusions: New antibiotics have been approved by the FDA in recent years mostly based on fewer, smaller, and non-inferiority pivotal trials that often used surrogate outcome measures but were commonly more costly. Efforts to incentivise the development of antibiotics should balance growing the antibiotic development pipeline with ensuring that clinical trials provide clinically relevant evidence of effectiveness in showing added benefits for the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.