Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936536›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Implementing an Inclusive, Multidisciplinary Supportive Care Model to Provide Integrated Care to Breast and Gynaecological Cancer Survivors: A Case Study at an Asian Ambulatory Cancer Centre.

Yu Ke, Yung Ying Tan, Patricia Soek Hui Neo, Grace Meijuan Yang, Kiley Wei-Jen Loh, Shirlynn Ho, Yee Pin Tan, Mothi Babu Ramalingam, Daniel Song Chiek Quah, Lita Chew and 3 more

Full text readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Models, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of supportive care in cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Returning to Work after Breast Cancer: A One-Year Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yu KeDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, SG.
Yung Ying TanDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, SG.
Patricia Soek Hui NeoDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, SG.
Grace Meijuan YangDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, SG.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0915-6007
Kiley Wei-Jen LohDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, SG.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-4677
Shirlynn HoDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, SG.
Yee Pin TanDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, SG.
Mothi Babu RamalingamDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, SG.
Daniel Song Chiek QuahDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, SG.
Lita ChewDepartment of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, SG.
Phebe En Hui SiDepartment of Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, SG.
Beng Choo TayDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, SG.
Alexandre ChanDuke-NUS Medical School Singapore, SG.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4391-4219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Supportive care models considering inclusivity and community services to improve integrated care for cancer survivors are limited. In this case study, we described the implementation of a multidisciplinary care model employing routine distress screening and embedded integrated care pathways to integrate care across disciplines and care sectors, while remaining inclusive of the multi-ethnic and multilingual population in Singapore. We reported implementation outcomes after 18 months of implementation. Description: We reviewed the model's process indicators from September 2019 to February 2021 at the largest public ambulatory cancer centre. Outcomes assessed included penetration, fidelity to screening protocol, and feasibility in three aspects - inclusiveness of different ethnic and language groups, responsiveness to survivors reporting high distress, and types of community service referrals. Discussion/conclusion: We elucidated opportunities to promote access to community services and inclusivity. Integration of community services from tertiary settings should be systematic through mutually beneficial educational and outreach initiatives, complemented by their inclusion in integrated care pathways to encourage systematic referrals and care coordination. A hybrid approach to service delivery is crucial in ensuring inclusivity while providing flexibility towards external changes such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Future work should explore using telehealth to bolster inclusiveness and advance community care integration.

Indexed as

cancerCOVID-19distress screeninginclusiveintegrated caresupportive care

Identifiers

PMID36936536
PMCPMC10022533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read121
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.