Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936502›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2023

Comparative efficacy and safety of antidepressant therapy for the agitation of dementia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Kaili Chen, Haiqi Li, Le Yang, Yan Jiang, Qiaoli Wang, Jiao Zhang, Jinting He

Open access · goldFull text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Antidepressant Use Among US Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Characterizing treatment initiation with central nervous system-active polypharmacy among adults with dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kaili ChenDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Haiqi LiDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Le YangDepartment of Endocrinology, Jilin Province People's Hospital, Changchun, China.
Yan JiangDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Qiaoli WangDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jiao ZhangDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jinting HeDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Union Hospital · CNJilin University · CNPeople 's Hospital of Jilin Province · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dementia is a clinical syndrome commonly seen in the elderly individuals. With the prevalence of dementia, the incidence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia patients is increasing annually. Agitation, as one of the neuropsychiatric symptoms, has a serious impact on the quality of life of patients with dementia. Several antidepressant drugs have been shown to be effective for treating agitated behavior symptoms in patients with dementia, but there are no direct comparisons among those drugs. Therefore, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) to examine the efficacy and safety of those antidepressant drugs. Methods: We searched eight databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database and China biomedical literature service) from their inception to 6 November 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy and safety of antidepressant drugs in treating agitated behavior symptoms in patients with dementia were included in our analysis. The quality assessment was carried out by two researchers individually and the analysis was based on the frequency method. Results: Twelve articles with 1,146 participants were included in our analysis. Based on the outcome of the agitation score, treatment with citalopram (standardized mean difference, SMD = -0.44, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = -0.72 to -0.16) showed significant benefits over the placebo group. Treatment with trazodone (odds ratio, OR = 4.58, 95% CI = 1.12-18.69) was associated with a higher risk of total adverse events compared with a placebo treatment. Conclusion: Among the antidepressant drugs included in this study, treatment with citalopram was probably the only optimal intervention, when considering the improvement from baseline to the end of the intervention, and there was not a statistically significant difference in safety when compared with a placebo treatment. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier: PROSPERO, CRD42022320932.

Indexed as

agitationAlzheimer's diseaseantidepressantdementianetwork meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36936502
PMCPMC10020338
OpenAlexW4323045057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read52
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.