ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2023
Clinical outcomes of increased focal amyloid uptake in individuals with subthreshold global amyloid levels.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between focal amyloid deposition and cognitive impairment in individuals below the amyloid threshold.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) method is objective and simple, cut-off optimization using global SUVR values may not reflect focal increased uptake in the cerebrum. The present study investigated clinical and neuroimaging characteristics according to focally increased β-amyloid (Aβ) uptake and global Aβ status. Methods: We recruited 968 participants with cognitive continuum. All participants underwent neuropsychological tests and 498 Results: A total of 62 (6.4%) subjects showed increased focal Aβ uptake with subthreshold global Aβ status [global (-) and focal (+) Aβ group, G(-)F(+) group]. The G(-)F(+) group showed worse performance in memory impairment ( Conclusion: Our findings suggest that individuals show distinctive clinical outcomes according to focally increased Aβ uptake and global Aβ status. Thus, researchers and clinicians should pay more attention to focal increased Aβ uptake in addition to global Aβ status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.