Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936471›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2023

Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery for multiple primary lung cancers after prior radical resection: A multicenter retrospective study.

Baiqiang Dong, Runzhe Chen, Xuan Zhu, Qing Wu, Jia'nan Jin, Wenqing Wang, Yujia Zhu, Hui Jiang, Nan Bi, Xu Wang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Multiple Primary Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Baiqiang DongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Runzhe ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuan ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qing WuDepartment of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China.
Jia'nan JinDepartment of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China.
Wenqing WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yujia ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hui JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Nan BiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xu WangDepartment of Radiology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaofang XuDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China.
Yujin XuDepartment of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China.
Ming ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNZhejiang Cancer Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients who previously underwent surgical resection of initial primary lung cancer are at a high risk of developing multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and surgery for MPLCs patients after prior radical resection for the first lung cancers. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, eligible MPLC patients with tumor diameter of 5.0 cm or less at N0M0 who underwent SBRT or reoperation between January 2013 and August 2020 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the 3-year locoregional recurrence and treatment-related toxicity. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates. The χ Results: A total of 203 (73 in the SBRT group and 130 in the surgery group) patients from three academic cancer centers were evaluated with a median follow-up of 38.3 months. The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 3-year incidences of locoregional recurrence were 5.6 %, 7.0 % and 13.1 % in the SBRT group versus 3.2 %, 4.8 % and 7.4 % in the surgery group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 1.97; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.74-5.24; Conclusions: SBRT is an effective therapeutic option with limited toxicity compared to surgery for patients with MPLCs after prior radical surgical resection, and it could be considered as an alternative treatment for those patients.

Indexed as

BED, biological effective doseCCI, Charlson comorbidity indexCSS, cancer-specific survivalCT, computed tomographyDM, distant metastasisFEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first secondFVC, forced vital capacityITV, internal target volumeKPS, Karnofsky performance statusLocoregional recurrenceLRR, locoregional recurrenceMPLC, multiple primary lung cancerMultiple primary lung cancersNSCLC, non-small cell lung cancerOS, overall survivalPET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomographyPTV, planning target volumeRadical resectionSBRT, stereotactic body radiation therapyStereotactic body radiation therapyToxicityTTP, time to progressionVATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36936471
PMCPMC10020093
OpenAlexW4320912622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.