Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936230›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

First experience with

Stein Gunnar Larsen, Wilhelm Graf, Anthony Burton Mariathasan, Olaf Sørensen, Milan Spasojevic, Mariusz Adam Goscinski, Silje Selboe, Nadja Lundstrøm, Anne Holtermann, Mona-Elisabeth Revheim and 1 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Effect of IntraperitonealTechnology in cancer research & treatment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stein Gunnar LarsenDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Section for Surgical Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Wilhelm GrafDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anthony Burton MariathasanDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Section for Surgical Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Olaf SørensenDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Section for Surgical Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Milan SpasojevicDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Section for Surgical Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mariusz Adam GoscinskiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Section for Surgical Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Silje SelboeDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Nadja LundstrømUppsala Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anne HoltermannDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Section for Surgical Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mona-Elisabeth RevheimDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Øyvind Sverre BrulandInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peritoneal metastasis (PM) from colorectal cancer carries a dismal prognosis despite extensive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). With a median time to recurrence of 11-12 months, there is a need for novel therapies. Radspherin® consists of the α-emitting radionuclide radium-224 ( Methods: A first-in-human phase 1 study (EudraCT 2018-002803-33) was conducted at two specialized CRS-HIPEC centers. Radspherin® was administered intraperitoneally 2 days after CRS-HIPEC. Dose escalation at increasing activity dose levels of 1-2-4-7-MBq, a split-dose repeated injection, and expansion cohorts were used to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Radspherin®. The aim was to explore the recommended dose and biodistribution using gamma-camera imaging. The results from the planned safety interim analysis after the completion of the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period of 30 days are presented. Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled: 14 in the dose escalation cohort, three in the repeated cohort, and six in the expansion cohort. Of the 23 enrolled patients, seven were men and 16 were women with a median age of 64 years (28-78). Twelve patients had synchronous PM stage IV and 11 patients had metachronous PM [primary stage II; (6) and stage III; (5)], with a disease-free interval of 15 months (3-30). The peritoneal cancer index was median 7 (3-19), operation time was 395 min (194-515), and hospital stay was 12 days (7-37). A total of 68 grade 2 adverse events were reported for 17 patients during the first 30 days; most were considered related to CRS and/or HIPEC. Only six of the TEAEs were evaluated as related to Radspherin®. One TEAE, anastomotic leakage, was reported as grade 3. Accordion ≥3 grade events occurred in a total of four of the 23 patients: reoperation due to anastomotic leaks (two) and drained abscesses (two). No DLT was documented at the 7 MBq dose level that was then defined as the recommended dose. The biodistribution of Radspherin® showed a relatively even peritoneal distribution. Conclusion: All dose levels of Radspherin® were well tolerated, and DLT was not reached. No deaths occurred, and no serious adverse events were considered related to Radspherin®.

Indexed as

224Raalpha emittercytoreductive surgeryhyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapymetastatic colorectal cancerperitoneal metastasistargeted alpha particle therapy

Identifiers

PMID36936230
PMCPMC10016379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read101
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.