Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936226›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Comparison of the effects of spinal anesthesia, paracervical block and general anesthesia on pain, nausea and vomiting, and analgesic requirements in diagnostic hysteroscopy: A non-randomized clinical trial.

Nahid Manouchehrian, Shamim Pilehvari, Farshid Rahimi-Bashar, Farzaneh Esna-Ashari, Shaghayegh Mohammadi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07358624 (Patient Satisfaction and Postoperative Pain After Diagnostic Hysteroscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07358624 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Patient Satisfaction and Postoperative Pain After Diagnostic Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Spinal and General Anesthesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorHopital Charles NicolleRan2024 to 2025Enrolled84ConditionsHysteroscopy, Patient Satisfaction, Postoperative PainArmsGroup GA: post operative pain scores and patient satisfaction evaluations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nahid ManouchehrianDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fatemi Medical Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran.
Shamim PilehvariDepartment of Gynecology, Fatemi Medical Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran.
Farshid Rahimi-BasharDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran.
Farzaneh Esna-AshariDepartment of Community Medicine, Medical Sciences Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran.
Shaghayegh MohammadiMedical Sciences Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran.
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of spinal anesthesia (SPA), paracervical block (PB), and general anesthesia (GA), on pain, the frequency of nausea and vomiting and analgesic requirements in diagnostic hysteroscopy. Methods: This single-center, non-randomized, parallel-group, clinical trial was conducted on 66 diagnostic hysteroscopy candidates who were selected by convenience sampling at Fatemieh Hospital, in Hamadan, Iran, in 2021. Results: The mean pain score during recovery and the need for analgesic injections was found to be significantly higher in the GA group compared to that in the SPA group (pain: 3.77 ± 2.25 vs. 0.10 ± 0.30, Conclusion: Despite reduced pain during recovery in patients receiving SPA, duration of anesthesia, recovery period, and return of motor function were significantly prolonged compared to those receiving PB or GA. It seems that PB with less recovery time and faster return of motor function than SPA and also mild pain during recovery compared to GA can be a good option for hysteroscopy. Clinical trial registration: http://www.irct.ir, identifier IRCT20120915010841N26.

Indexed as

anesthesiageneral anesthesiahysteroscopyparacervicalspinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID36936226
PMCPMC10016381
OpenAlexW4322732349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read58
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.