Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36936193›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2023

Bayesian hierarchical models and prior elicitation for fitting psychometric functions.

Maura Mezzetti, Colleen P Ryan, Priscilla Balestrucci, Francesco Lacquaniti, Alessandro Moscatelli

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maura MezzettiDepartment Economics and Finance, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Colleen P RyanDepartment of Systems Medicine and Centre of Space Bio-Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Priscilla BalestrucciApplied Cognitive Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Francesco LacquanitiDepartment of Systems Medicine and Centre of Space Bio-Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Alessandro MoscatelliDepartment of Systems Medicine and Centre of Space Bio-Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our previous articles demonstrated how to analyze psychophysical data from a group of participants using generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) and two-level methods. The aim of this article is to revisit hierarchical models in a Bayesian framework. Bayesian models have been previously discussed for the analysis of psychometric functions although this approach is still seldom applied. The main advantage of using Bayesian models is that if the prior is informative, the uncertainty of the parameters is reduced through the combination of prior knowledge and the experimental data. Here, we evaluate uncertainties between and within participants through posterior distributions. To demonstrate the Bayesian approach, we re-analyzed data from two of our previous studies on the tactile discrimination of speed. We considered different methods to include

Indexed as

Bayesian modelgeneralized linear mixed modelsPSEpsychometric functionspsychophysics

Identifiers

PMID36936193
PMCPMC10018033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read5
table measurements read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.