ReviewAsiaIntervention2023
DEFINITION criteria for left main bifurcation stenting - from clinical need to a formula.
Review in AsiaIntervention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design of IKISS-LM Randomized Controlled Trial: Impact of Kissing Balloon Inflation on Provisional Left-Main Bifurcation PCI.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Bifurcation Stenting Techniques for Left Main Disease: A Network Meta-analysis With Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
- Coronary Bifurcation PCI-Part II: Advanced Considerations.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Coronary Bifurcation PCI-Part I: Fundamentals.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Double-Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Coronary Bifurcations: A 1-Year Follow-up Study in Vietnam.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Article
- The shortcomings of the Medina compared to the Movahed coronary bifurcation classification.Future cardiology · 2025Review
- Letter: Limitless suffixes for bifurcation classification with the Movahed coronary bifurcation lesion classification system.AsiaIntervention · 2023Article
- Reply: Limitless suffixes for bifurcation classification with the Movahed coronary bifurcation lesion classification system.AsiaIntervention · 2023Article
- Complex distal left main bifurcation disease requiring a two-stent approach: in search of an accurate DEFINITION.AsiaIntervention · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents for coronary bifurcation lesions is associated with higher rates of in-stent restenosis, myocardial infarction, and revascularisation as compared with non-coronary bifurcation lesions. The increased percentage of suboptimal results after stenting bifurcation lesions is largely, if not always, due to the extreme complexity of the anatomy. Obviously, one weapon (stenting technique) does not suit all enemies (bifurcation lesions with different anatomies), and it underscores the importance of establishing a stratification system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.