ArticleClinical epidemiology2023
Testing of Coding Algorithms for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Identification, as Indication for Use of Biological Drugs, Using a Claims Database from Southern Italy.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Epidemiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Italy: Treatment Patterns, Adherence, and Costs in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Treated with Mesalazine.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- Beyond ICD-10 Codes: A Multi-class Machine-Learning Approach to Identify True IBD Cases in Electronic Medical Records.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Trajectories of Adherence to Biologics in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Large-Scale Multi-Regional Italian Study Through the VALORE Distributed Database.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a META-Algorithm to Identify the Indications of Use of Biological Drugs Approved for the Treatment of Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases from Claims Databases: Insights from the VALORE Project.Clinical epidemiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic diseases that have been increasingly treated with biological drugs in recent years. Newly developed coding algorithms for IBD identification using claims databases are needed to improve post-marketing surveillance of biological drugs. Objective: To test algorithms to identify CD and UC, as indication for use of biological drugs approved for IBD treatment, using a claims database. Methods: Data were extracted from the Caserta Local Health Unit database between 2015 and 2018. CD/UC diagnoses reported by specialists in electronic therapeutic plans (ETPs) were considered as gold standard. Five algorithms were developed based on ICD-9-CM codes as primary cause of hospital admissions, exemption from healthcare service co-payment codes and drugs dispensing with only indication for CD/UC. The accuracy was assessed by sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive (PPV) and negative predicted values (NPV) along with computation of the Youden Index and F-score. Results: In the study period, 1205 subjects received at least one biological drug dispensing approved for IBD and 134 (11.1%) received ≥1 ETP with IBD as use indication. Patients with CD and CU were 83 (61.9%) and 51 (38.1%), respectively. Sensitivity of the different algorithms ranged from 71.1% (95% CI: 60.1-80.5) to 98.8 (95% CI: 93.5-100.0) for CD and from 64.7% (95% CI: 50.1-77.6) to 94.1 (95% CI: 83.8-98.8) for UC, while specificity was always higher than 91%. The best CD algorithm was "Algorithm 3", based on hospital CD diagnosis code OR CD exemption code OR [IBD exemption code AND dispensing of non-biological drugs with only CD indication] (Se: 98.8%; Sp: 97.2%; PPV: 84.5%, NPV: 99.8%), achieving the highest diagnostic accuracy (Youden Index=0.960). The best UC algorithm was "Algorithm 3", based on specific hospital UC diagnosis code OR UC exemption code OR [IBD exemption code AND golimumab dispensing] OR dispensing of non-biological drugs with only UC indication (Se: 94.1%; Sp: 91.6%; PPV: 50.0%; NPV: 99.4%), and achieving the highest diagnostic accuracy (Youden Index=0.857). Conclusion: In a population-based claims database, newly coding algorithms including diagnostic and exemption codes plus specific drug dispensing yielded highly accurate identification of CD and UC as distinct indication for biological drug use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.