Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36935916›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

A pilot study to develop assessment tools for Group A Streptococcus surveillance studies.

Janessa Pickering, Claudia Sampson, Marianne Mullane, Meru Sheel, Dylan D Barth, Mary Lane, Roz Walker, David Atkinson, Jonathan R Carapetis, Asha C Bowen

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Janessa PickeringWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia., Perth, Australia.
Claudia SampsonSchool of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, Australia.
Marianne MullaneWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia., Perth, Australia.
Meru SheelSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Dylan D BarthWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia., Perth, Australia.
Mary LaneBroome Regional Aboriginal Medical Service, Broome, Australia.
Roz WalkerSchool of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
David AtkinsonSchool of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, Australia.
Jonathan R CarapetisWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia., Perth, Australia.
Asha C BowenWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia., Perth, Australia.
University of Western Australia · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUBroome Regional Aboriginal Medical Service · AUMurdoch University · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Group A Methods: Yarning circle conversations and semi-structured interviews were performed with Aboriginal caregivers and used to develop the language and composition of a sore throat checklist. The sore throat story checklist was combined with established methods of GAS pharyngitis and impetigo surveillance (examination, bacteriological culture, rapid antigen detection and serological tests) and new technologies (photography) and used for a pilot cross-sectional surveillance study of Aboriginal children attending their health clinic for a routine appointment. Feasibility, acceptability, and study costs were compiled. Results: Ten Aboriginal caregivers participated in the sore-throat yarning circles; a checklist was derived from predominant symptoms and their common descriptors. Over two days, 21 Aboriginal children were approached for the pilot surveillance study, of whom 17 were recruited; median age was 9 years [IQR 5.5-13.5], 65% were female. One child declined throat swabbing and three declined finger pricks; all other surveillance elements were completed by each child indicating high acceptability of surveillance assessments. Mean time for screening assessment was 19 minutes per child. Transport of clinical specimens enabled gold standard microbiological and serological testing for GAS. Retrospective examination of sore throat photography concorded with assessments performed on the day. Conclusion: Yarning circle conversations were effective in deriving culturally appropriate sore throat questionnaires for GAS pharyngitis surveillance. New and established tools were feasible, practical and acceptable to participants and enable surveillance to determine the burden of superficial GAS infections in communities at high risk of RF. Surveillance of GAS pharyngitis and impetgio in remote Australia informs primary RF prevention with potential global translation.

Indexed as

ImpetigoPharyngitisRheumatic FeverStreptococcal InfectionsAdolescentAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesStreptococcus pyogenesGAS impetigoGAS pharyngitisGAS skin soresGroup A Streptococcus (GAS)Rheumatic fever (RF)

Identifiers

PMID36935916
PMCPMC10022509
OpenAlexW4324149661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read16
reference markers read5
identifiers read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.