Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36935912›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Structure-based computational screening of 470 natural quercetin derivatives for identification of SARS-CoV-2 M

Abd Kakhar Umar, James H Zothantluanga, Jittima Amie Luckanagul, Patanachai Limpikirati, Sriwidodo Sriwidodo

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Structure optimization and molecular dynamics studies of new tumor-selectiveJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  6. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bioactive Compounds inNutrients · 2024
    Article
  10. Computational identification ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Abd Kakhar UmarDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang, Jawa barat, Indonesia.
James H ZothantluangaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Dibrugarh University, Assam, India.
Jittima Amie LuckanagulDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patanachai LimpikiratiDepartment of Food and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sriwidodo SriwidodoDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang, Jawa barat, Indonesia.
Chulalongkorn University · THPadjadjaran University · IDDibrugarh University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic infecting the respiratory system through a notorious virus known as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Due to viral mutations and the risk of drug resistance, it is crucial to identify new molecules having potential prophylactic or therapeutic effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the present study, we aimed to identify a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 through virtual screening of a compound library of 470 quercetin derivatives by targeting the main protease-Mpro (PDB ID: 6LU7). The study was carried out with computational techniques such as molecular docking simulation studies (MDSS), molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MMGBSA) techniques. Among the natural derivatives, compound 382 (PubChem CID 65604) showed the best binding affinity to Mpro (-11.1 kcal/mol). Compound 382 interacted with LYS5, TYR126, GLN127, LYS137, ASP289, PHE291, ARG131, SER139, GLU288, and GLU290 of the Mpro protein. The SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-382 complex showed acceptable stability during the 100 ns MD simulations. The SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-382 complex also showed an MM-GBSA binding free energy value of -54.0 kcal/mol. The binding affinity, stability, and free energy results for 382 and Mpro were better than those of the native ligand and the standard inhibitors ledipasvir and cobicistat. The conclusion of our study was that compound 382 has the potential to inhibit SARS-Cov-2 Mpro. However, further investigations such as

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2CobicistatHumansMolecular Docking SimulationQuercetinCobicistatQuercetinCOVID-19In-silicoMain proteaseQuercetinSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36935912
PMCPMC10022500
OpenAlexW4324149369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read21
identifiers read16
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.