Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36935870›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2023

An Initial Analysis of the Baseline Levels of Dd-cfDNA After Pancreas Transplantation: A Prospective Study From High-volume Centers in the United States.

Ashley Yoo, Alexandria Riedel, Ian Qian, Amanda Bartosic, Rudi Soltani, Gulam Kibria, Abdolreza Haririan, Cinthia B Drachenberg, Peter L Abrams, Jon S Odorico and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Noninvasive Diagnosis of Kidney Allograft Rejection.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ashley YooDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Alexandria RiedelDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Ian QianDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Amanda BartosicDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Rudi SoltaniDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Gulam KibriaDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Abdolreza HaririanDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Cinthia B DrachenbergDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Peter L AbramsMedstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC.
Jon S OdoricoDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Matthew CooperMedstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC.
Jonathan S BrombergDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Joseph R ScaleaDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreas transplantation offers patients with diabetes an opportunity for glucose homeostasis. Current blood tests to surveil for rejection have poor sensitivity and specificity for identifying rejection, and pancreas biopsies are challenging and associated with morbidity and graft loss. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is shed from transplanted organs and detectable in peripheral blood. Thus, a potential dd-cfDNA blood test assessing rejection would be clinically advantageous. Methods: One hundred eighty-one dd-cfDNA samples (n) were collected from 77 patients (N) up to 132 mo posttransplant. Results: The median dd-cfDNA level among all subjects was 0.28% (0.13%, 0.71%). In simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients, the median dd-cfDNA level was 0.29% (0.13%, 0.71%), and it was 0.23% (0.08%, 0.71%) in pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients. When isolating for when without infection or rejection, the median dd-cfDNA level was 0.28% (0.13%, 0.64%) for SPK and 0.20% (0.00%, 0.32%) for PTA. Both transplant types approached 1.0% ≤1 mo posttransplant followed by a decrease in median dd-cfDNA. During episodes of rejection or infection, median dd-cfDNA levels were greater among all transplant types. Conclusions: The mean dd-cfDNA level for all pancreas transplant recipients is <1.0%, consistent with the published kidney transplant rejection threshold (>1.0%), regardless of SPK or PTA. Early posttransplant dd-cfDNA levels are transiently higher than later measurements. Dd-cfDNA elevation also correlates with rejection and infection and thus is a promising biomarker for surveilling pancreas transplant dysfunction.

Identifiers

PMID36935870
PMCPMC10019258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.