Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36935853›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2023

Stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy of adrenal metastases combines high ablative doses with optimized sparing of organs at risk.

Philipp Hoegen, Efthimios Katsigiannopulos, Carolin Buchele, Sebastian Regnery, Fabian Weykamp, Elisabetta Sandrini, Jonas Ristau, Jakob Liermann, Eva Meixner, Tobias Forster and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philipp HoegenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Efthimios KatsigiannopulosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carolin BucheleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian RegneryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian WeykampDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Elisabetta SandriniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jonas RistauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jakob LiermannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva MeixnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tobias ForsterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
C Katharina RenkampDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian SchlüterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carolin RippkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian KlüterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Juliane Hörner-RieberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose/Objective: To evaluate the potential of stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) to fulfill dose recommendations for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of adrenal metastases and spare organs at risk (OAR). Materials and methods: In this subgroup analysis of a prospective registry trial, 22 patients with adrenal metastases were treated on a 0.35 T MR-Linac in 5-12 fractions with fraction doses of 4-10 Gy. Baseline plans were re-calculated to the anatomy of the day. These predicted plans were reoptimized to generate adapted plans. Baseline, predicted and adapted plans were compared with regard to PTV objectives, OAR constraints and published dose recommendations. Results: The cohort comprised patients with large GTV (median 36.0 cc) and PTV (median 66.6 cc) and predominantly left-sided metastases. 179 of 181 fractions (98.9 %) were adapted because of PTV and/or OAR violations. Predicted plans frequently violated PTV coverage (99.4 %) and adjacent OAR constraints (bowel: 32.9 %, stomach: 32.8 %, duodenum: 10.4 %, kidneys: 10.8 %). In the predicted plans, the volume exposed to the maximum dose was exceeded up to 16-fold in the duodenum and up to 96-fold in the spinal cord. Adapted plans significantly reduced OAR violations by 96.4 % for the bowel, 98.5 % for the stomach, 85.6 % for the duodenum and 83.3 % for the kidneys. Plan adaptation improved PTV coverage from 82.7 ± 8.1 % to 90.6 ± 4.9 % (p < 0.001). Furthermore, recently established target volume thresholds could easily be fulfilled with SMART. No toxicities > grade II occurred. Conclusion: SMART fulfills established GTV and PTV dose recommendations while simultaneously sparing organs at risk even in a challenging cohort.

Indexed as

OligometastasisOligoprogressionOnline adaptive radiotherapySABRSBRTSMART

Identifiers

PMID36935853
PMCPMC10014324
OpenAlexW4312054896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.