Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36935845›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2023

Comparative complete scheme and booster effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants: A case-case study based on electronic health records.

Irina Kislaya, André Peralta-Santos, Vítor Borges, Luís Vieira, Carlos Sousa, Bibiana Ferreira, Ana Pelerito, João Paulo Gomes, Pedro Pinto Leite, Baltazar Nunes and 17 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Relative Virulence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Individuals Hospitalized With SARS-CoV-2.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Irina KislayaDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5772-2416
André Peralta-SantosPublic Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health Universidade NOVA de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal.
Vítor BorgesGenomic and Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Luís VieiraDepartamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge Unidade de Tecnologia e Inovação Lisbon Portugal.
Carlos SousaUnilabs Porto Portugal.
Bibiana FerreiraAlgarve Biomedical Center Research Institute (ABC-RI) Faro Portugal.
Ana PeleritoPortuguese Red Cross Laboratory Lisbon Portugal.
João Paulo GomesGenomic and Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Pedro Pinto LeiteDireção de Serviços de Informação e Análise Direção-Geral da Saúde Lisbon Portugal.
Baltazar NunesDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
PT COVID‐19 group
Ausenda MachadoDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Ana Paula RodriguesDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Vasco Ricoca PeixotoDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Pedro CasacaDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Eugenia FernandesDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Eduardo RodriguesDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Rita FerreiraDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Joana IsidroDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Miguel PintoDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Sílvia DuarteDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Daniela SantosDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Luís MenesesDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
José Pedro AlmeidaDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Ana MatiasDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Samanta FreireDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
Teresa GriloDepartment of Epidemiology National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal.
National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge · PTNational School of Public Health · GRAlgarve Biomedical Center · PTDireção Geral do Território · PTPortuguese Army · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Information on vaccine effectiveness in a context of novel variants of concern (VOC) emergence is of key importance to inform public health policies. This study aimed to estimate a measure of comparative vaccine effectiveness between Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2 and sub-lineages) VOC according to vaccination exposure (primary or booster). Methods: We developed a case-case study using data on RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2-positive cases notified in Portugal during Weeks 49-51, 2021. To obtain measure of comparative vaccine effectiveness, we compared the odds of vaccination in Omicron cases versus Delta using logistic regression adjusted for age group, sex, region, week of diagnosis, and laboratory of origin. Results: Higher odds of vaccination were observed in cases infected by Omicron VOC compared with Delta VOC cases for both complete primary vaccination (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 2.4) and booster dose (OR = 5.2; 95% CI: 3.1 to 8.8), equivalent to reduction of vaccine effectiveness from 44.7% and 92.8%, observed against infection with Delta, to -6.0% (95% CI: 29.2% to 12.7%) and 62.7% (95% CI: 35.7% to 77.9%), observed against infection with Omicron, for complete primary vaccination and booster dose, respectively. Conclusion: Consistent reduction in vaccine-induced protection against infection with Omicron was observed. Complete primary vaccination may not be protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection in regions where Omicron variant is dominant.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesElectronic Health RecordsHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccinescase–case designCOVID‐19Delta variantOmicron variantSARS‐CoV‐2vaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID36935845
PMCPMC10014519
OpenAlexW4324374125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read49
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.